Denver Slaughterhouse Ban Initiative 309 Gives Voters an Opportunity to Shut Down Superior Farms' Largest Lamb Slaughterhouse

If Denver voters approve initiative 309, Superior Farms' animal cruelty violations could finally be brought to an end.

See below for a statement from Pro-Animal Future:

Animal Outlook's 2017 investigation revealing rampant animal cruelty at lamb slaughterhouses owned by Superior Farms helped inspire a ballot initiative to ban industrial slaughterhouses in Denver, Colorado, home to the company's largest factory.

Now Denver voters are faced with a historic choice. Voting Yes on Initiative 309 will finally bring true accountability to a company that has recklessly violated animal welfare, labor, and environmental laws for years.

The problems at Superior Farms go beyond just the treatment of animals. The company's long history of environmental violations is well-documented, and it poses a risk not only to the animals but also to the local community. Residents of Denver have voiced concerns about pollution, noise, and odor issues stemming from the slaughterhouse, which sits in close proximity to residential neighborhoods. This pollution has the potential to affect air and water quality, endangering both public health and Denver's natural environment. Advocates were vindicated in September when the EPA announced a $120,000 fine levied against Superior Farms for violations of the Clean Air Act. The EPA's website also documents extensive, years-long violations of the Clean Water Act.

Superior Farms’ poor record of compliance with labor laws is yet another issue. Workers at the facility are subjected to dangerous working conditions, low wages, and a lack of benefits. Industrial slaughterhouses are notorious for their high rates of worker injuries due to fast line speeds, exposure to harmful chemicals, and the physical demands of the job. Despite this, companies like Superior Farms continue to prioritize profits over the safety and well-being of their workers, exploiting a largely immigrant workforce that has few other employment options. The company's plant in Denver has been fined $92,000 over the last decade for labor violations, but given their $250 Million annual revenue, these represent a slap on the wrist rather than true accountability.

A Yes vote on Initiative 309 sends a clear message: the public will not stand by while companies like Superior Farms cut corners at the expense of animals, workers, and the environment. The initiative seeks to ban all industrial slaughterhouses, not just Superior Farms, meaning it will have a lasting impact on how animals are treated in the city. It’s part of a broader movement to reimagine food systems that are kinder, cleaner, and more just.

Additionally, the ballot measure addresses an important environmental justice issue. Industrial slaughterhouses like Superior Farms are disproportionately located in lower-income areas and communities of color, who often bear the brunt of the negative environmental impacts. Superior Farms' Denver plant is located in Globeville, a majority latino neighborhood located in America's most polluted residential zip code. By banning these facilities, Denver can take a step towards rectifying these historical inequities and improving the quality of life for all residents, particularly those living in vulnerable communities.

Voting Yes on Initiative 309 is about building a future that aligns with Denver’s values of sustainability, fairness, and compassion. It’s an opportunity to set an example for cities across the country and to show that it’s possible to stand up to corporate interests that prioritize profit over people and the planet. Denver has a chance to make history, and the outcome of this vote could spark a nationwide movement to rethink the role of industrial slaughterhouses in our communities.

The choice is clear: Denver can either continue to allow companies like Superior Farms to operate without consequence, or it can take decisive action to protect animals, workers, and the environment. Voting Yes on Initiative 309 will lead to a cleaner, safer, and more just Denver for generations to come.

Historic Settlement after Animal Outlook Files Federal False Claims Act Lawsuit; Slaughterer Pays and Enters Consent Decree with USDA to Reform Practices

We teamed up with Public Justice to file a lawsuit under the False Claims Act as a whistleblower following our hidden camera investigation; in a rare move, the Department of Justice intervened over humane handling allegations.

After we determined what our investigator caught on hidden camera was horrific cruelty to lambs at Superior Farms, the largest lamb slaughterhouse in the U.S., we not only exposed these abuses for the world to see in a powerful exclusive report in The New York Times, we also took legal action to seek justice and demand change.

Our 2017 investigation inside Superior Farms is the first - and only - look inside a U.S. lamb slaughter facility, and our investigator documented what we believe were a variety of humane handling violations, despite the company’s claim to be using slaughter practices in keeping with federal and religious law.

At the time of our investigation, Superior Farms had been awarded numerous contracts from the USDA and Department of Defense to supply both fresh and frozen meat to the federal government for its food assistance programs, including the National School Lunch Program. As part of these federal contracts, companies are required to comply with the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act.

The False Claims Act (FCA) allows whistleblowers to file complaints when there is possible fraud against the government, including evidence alleging violations of government contracts. FCA cases are filed with the Dept. of Justice, which has the option to intervene and get more directly involved in the case.   

Our False Claims Act case is the first-ever intervention and settlement by the U.S. Department of Justice over humane handling allegations at a ritual slaughter establishment. As a part of this settlement, Superior Farms' parent company, Transhumance, has entered into a consent decree with the USDA involving oversight and reform of several of its practices.

Our undercover video showed:

• Violations of the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, which requires that animals a) be rendered insensible to pain before slaughtered, or b) be slaughtered in accordance with religious ritual that prevents the animal from feeling pain during the remainder of the slaughter process (such as kosher or halal methods)
• A policy of changing the “best by” date on fresh meat to make it appear fresher than it is. At times the dates were changed by more than two weeks
• A repeated failure to comply with its internal policy to run meat through metal detectors to ensure the meat is safe for consumption

The consent decree with the USDA mandates that Superior Farms:

• Within 30 days, must designate a Humane Handling Coordinator with at least two years of experience in livestock slaughter or who has taken instructional courses and training in humane handling and slaughter from a reputable organization. The humane handling coordinator will ensure compliance with humane slaughter law and  equipment used to restrain and stun animals have been tested for functionality and that animals are rendered unconscious by a single application
• Conduct refresher training for its management, supervisors, and employees working in the live animal areas in all aspects of the humane handling and slaughter requirements set forth in the HMSA within 60 days
• To the extent that it continues to market itself as Halal, Superior Farms must maintain active certification for Halal slaughter from an outside Halal certifying organization

This case represents a milestone for animal advocates, where a public advocacy organization teamed up with the federal government to set a standard for oversight and enforcement and to promote reform. 

We pursued this case with the vision that this resolution delivers: Real change for the animals at Superior Farms and a message to animal agribusinesses that compliance with humane slaughter law is not optional -- they are not free to police themselves, including at ritual slaughter establishments.

"This settlement sends a loud and clear message to industrial animal ag that consumer rights and animal welfare groups alike will hold it to account when it makes false claims, including leveraging the government where necessary,” said David Muraskin, Senior Food Project Attorney at Public Justice, who represents the whistleblower.

Animal Outlook  was represented by Cheryl Leahy as well as Richard Elias of Elias LLC, David Muraskin and Brian Hardingham of Public Justice, and Jennifer Verkamp of Morgan Verkamp.

Kelli L. Taylor of the U.S. Department of Justice was among the government attorneys intervening in the case.